H1N1 Vaccine with Mercury and Squalene Pushed on Pregnant Women

S. L. Baker
Natural News
September 14, 2009

It’s getting crazy out there. New revelations about the novel H1N1 vaccine are raising more questions than ever about its safety while there’s a new drive to push shots of the stuff as quickly as possible on perfectly healthy pregnant women. That means the most vulnerable of all — unborn children — will be exposed to a little-tested vaccine. According to a CDC authored article just published in the British journal Lancet, “Once available, vaccination will be an essential component of the public health response to this influenza, and US guidelines place pregnant women in a high-priority group for receipt of pandemic influenza vaccine.”

Note the keys words in the statement: “once available”. The words you might expect, “once thoroughly tested for safety,” are nowhere to be found. According to an article just published in the Denver Post, Dr. Keiji Fukuda, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) own flu chief, has warned about the potential dangers of untested vaccines (although he has stopped short of criticizing Europe’s full-steam-ahead approach of promoting H!NI vaccinations).

To top it off, now comes word out of the FDA’s Vaccine and Related Biologic Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting held on July 23rd that the H1N1 vaccine is going to be laced with the mercury containing preservative thimerosal. That’s right, the same thimerosal that was banned in influenza vaccines in California and several other states starting in 2004. The reason? The mercury-laden toxin has been linked to a number of health concerns — including worries thimerosal caused or contributed to the current autism epidemic.

Is this an absolute scientific fact? No, the jury is still out on the controversy but, bottom line, thimerosal contains mercury. Even more importantly, the targeting of pregnant women seems unwise. In fact, the Environmental Protection Agency EPA) web site states that “factors that determine how severe the health effects are from mercury exposure include… the age of the person exposed (the fetus is the most susceptible).”

Other worrisome tidbits of information about the vaccine have been revealed in recent days. A Lancet editorial suggests that any U.S. plan to rely on swine flu vaccines without ingredients to stretch the supply would reduce the number of vaccination shots available other countries. The solution for vaccine manufacturers, allowing them to stretch the vaccine to go further, could be the addition of ingredients called adjuvants. According to breaking news about the use of adjuvants in the H1N1 vaccine, Bloomberg is reporting these compounds have never been approved for flu vaccines in the U.S. and some studies have shown they cause immune disorders in mice. However, back on July 7, in a not-widely-reported announcement, WHO recommended that adjuvants be used to boost production quantity of vaccines available world-wide.

The Age of Autism, a daily web newspaper covering the autism epidemic, has raised some important points about these adjuvants. The web site points out that the VRBPAC was not furnished with information on the safety of adjuvants in the new flu vaccine. “Of concern is that the proposed adjuvants (AS03 and MF59) are squalene (oil) based and studies suggest that exposure to squalene is associated with production of auto-antibodies and auto-immune disease,” the web site states. What’s more, some veterans have claimed that squalene adjuvant in vaccines was responsible for Gulf War Syndrome.

According to the Lancet article, the reason the H1N1 vaccine is being pushed on healthy pregnant women is because from April 15 to May 18, 2009, there were 34 confirmed or probable (that means they were not actually scientifically confirmed as H1N1 at all) cases of H1N1 flu in pregnant US women reported to the CDC. Eleven of these (32 percent) were admitted to hospitals. That hospital admission rate is more than four times higher than for the general population.

But the authors of the article admit this high rate of hospitalization of women with H1N1 could simply be the result of doctors being more likely to admit a pregnant woman to the hospital than someone else in the general population with the exact same symptoms. So there is no real evidence that pregnant women are more hard-hit by the virus than anyone else. Yes, there were six deaths in pregnant US women believed to have the H1N1 flu between April 15 and June 16, 2009. All developed pneumonia and subsequent acute respiratory distress syndrome. But where is the data showing whether they were suffering from other illnesses? What was their nutritional and general health status? Did they have other infections before coming down with the flu? Was it really H1N1 that killed them?

Bottom line: there are more questions than answers about H1N1. Making assumptions, including assuming that healthy pregnant women and their unborn babies will have their health protected by being exposed to an untested vaccine with unknown long term consequences, simply doesn’t make sense. Yes, the H1N1 virus may mutate into something extremely serious. But it is important to remember that, right now, the flu it causes is relatively mild.

Doc here: Hey – it really is getting crazy out there! If you know anything about the agenda of the elite ruling class of the world, you already know that one of their primary objectives is to reduce the world population to 500 million. Yes – that’s worldwide population! Look for yourself by researching the ‘Georgia Guidestones’ then you may call me crazy too! Hey – why not use a worldwide ‘mandatory’ vaccination to kickstart the death toll – along with wars, famines, genetically modified foods, poisoned tap water, etc…   Please, please, please – do not, under any circumstances – consent to this immunization/vaccine!!! Keep yourself and your family safe from these ‘crazy’ people! Instead, protect them with the ‘Flu Prevention Kit’ – three simple and safe products to help boost your immunity to any virus, flu or otherwise.


Advertisements

Tags: , ,

5 Responses to “H1N1 Vaccine with Mercury and Squalene Pushed on Pregnant Women”

  1. Jeanne Mangual Says:

    I recently read an article regarding the autism/vaccine connection concerning a study done in the Amish community. I wish I could post a link here, but the source escapes me for the moment. However, the report detailed several key points that bear repeating. The Amish are known to shun vaccines for their entire population, citing religious beliefs. It was interesting to note that the Amish have zero incidence of autism in their community, with one single exception- one child WAS vaccinated, either unbeknownst to the family or by some other manner mistakenly, and this poor child IS autistic. How terrifying that even now, given the epidemic proportion of children in this country with autism today (most likely caused by vaccines, in my view) most of whom face a future of constant struggle…………..we cannot see our fate if we continue vaccinations of ANY kind. I thank God my daughter is apparently well today, even though I (stupidly) allowed her to be vaccinated when she was born, although who is to say she will be in the future????????????? At least I am smarter now, and have made it a point over the last several years to become as educated as possible on that subject, as well as living a naturopathic lifestyle. I fear the worst for all of our children yet to be born- especially if they are to be vaccinated with ever more deadly products as the years go by…………….
    If anyone has read the study or the article I mentioned, would you please post the link? I’d be forever indebted…………..

  2. notepad publishing Says:

    H1N1 notepad

    October 2009
    On October 1 2009, a former federal health minister dismisses as “crackpots and conspiracy theorists” those who would actively discourage Australians from having their swine flu vaccine’. October 2nd, the San Fransisco Chronicle publishes that ‘Everybody seems to be saying TRUST THE GOVERNMENT but it’s hard to trust the H1N1 vaccination campaign’ and on October 4rd, the Washington Post wonders ‘When the swine flu vaccine finally arrives this week, will Americans line up to get it?’ and CBS News writes about health care workers protesting the flu vaccine mandate. October 7th Healthnews writes that 72 percent are concerned about potential vaccine side effects and the Examiner writes that’ theorists believe that government may force people to take the vaccine’. October 8th Times&Transscript publishes that ‘a mercury-based preservative called thimerosal would be included as one of the substances in the H1N1 vaccine’, Medill Reports writes that Dr. Mayer Eisenstein is advising his patients to say no and is convinced that vaccines cause autism and the Los Angeles Times Blog publishes that media commentators Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh have apparently fallen prey to the loony websites of the anti-vaccine folks and that Beck would do “the exact opposite” of what the government recommended and attend a swine flu party.

    View this article with all media references @ http://www.conspirare.net

    CONSPIRACY (from Lat. conspirare, literally to breathe together, to agree, combine, and especially to form a secret plot)

    notepad publishing, Swiss News Agency

  3. Lucy Says:

    I received the H1N1 shot on 11/23/09. I was 8 weeks 6 Days and my baby died that day!

    I have done research and went to the health dept where my shot was administed and got the lot number. I am shocked to know the vaccine contains toxic ingredients. They are:

    . MF59C.1 is an oil/water emulsion containing 9.75 mg squalene, 1.175 mg polysorbate 80 and 1.175 mg sorbitan trioleate in a citrate buffer. Quantities are expressed per 0.5 ml vaccine dose.

    – Other Ingredients:

    The other ingredients are: thiomersal (MERCURY) (multidose vial only), sodium chloride, potassium chloride, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium phosphate dihydrate, magnesium chloride hexahydrate, calcium chloride dihydrate, sodium citrate, citric acid and water for injections.

    If any of you have had adverse reactions to this vaccine PLEASE report it online at https://vaers.hhs.gov/esub/index

    Also, I am trying to find someone who KNOWS what tests can be ran on my fetus at this early stage to determine EXACTLY if this vaccine contibuted to my fetus’ death. Please email me if you can help.

  4. womens healyh Says:

    Everything is very open with a precise description of the issues.
    It was definitely informative. Your website is very helpful.
    Thanks for sharing!

  5. squalane oil Says:

    Squalane is produced by our bodies in small amounts.
    If dry or mature skin is your skin type, Lustro Face Oil
    2 from Beauty Counter is ideal. The acute onset of what seems to be extreme seborrheic dermatitis of the
    face can arise as just one of the manifestations of obtained immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: