Archive for the ‘Health’ Category

Telegraph: Was swine flu ever a real threat?

February 5, 2010

Mark Honigsbaum
London Telegraph
February 2, 2010

It’s been a good week for drug companies and an even better one for conspiracy theorists. Last Tuesday, angered by the bumper rise in profits being reported by vaccine manufacturers as the incidence of swine flu plummets, the former head of health at the Council for Europe accused the World Health Organization of “faking” the pandemic.

“It looks like the WHO is under the influence of industry,” Dr Wolfgang Wodarg told a hearing in Strasbourg. “It was stated in panic-stricken terms that this was a flu that could threaten humanity. This is why billions of medications were bought.”

Exhibit number one, says Dr Wodarg, is the WHO’s decision to soften its definition of a pandemic last April, shortly before the emergence of the H1N1 virus. By eliminating the requirement that influenza pandemics should cause “enormous morbidity and death”, the WHO provoked an unnecessary “scare” that conveniently triggered the activation of “sleeping” contracts with vaccine manufacturers. Yet since the WHO’s declaration of a pandemic in June, swine flu has caused just 14,000 deaths worldwide – a fraction of the number who die from seasonal flu every year. This month, the Department of Health reported that cases had fallen to such a low rate that it was cancelling its weekly press briefings.

Like all conspiracy theorists, Wodarg started with the question “Cui bono?” and served up a plausible bad guy. For its part, the WHO vigorously denies the allegations and says Wodarg is “trivialising” what for millions of people has been a very serious problem.

So who is right? Was swine flu ever a genuine pandemic threat, or was it all a lot of (very expensive) fuss about nothing? And what are the lessons for the future? When, in late March, residents of La Gloria, in Mexico, began complaining of peculiar fevers, aches and sore throats, no one took much notice at first. The Mexican government, like the WHO, was focused on a different threat: bird flu. Following the re-emergence of the H5N1 avian virus in 2005, the WHO had drawn up a comprehensive pandemic plan, complete with a phased alert system, to be activated in the event that the virus, which had a mortality rate as high as 60 per cent, began spreading widely in human populations.

“The concern was that if bird flu suddenly went pandemic, it could trigger mortality on a massive scale,” explains John Oxford, professor of virology at Barts and The London Hospital. “The last thing anyone was expecting at that point was a pig virus from Mexico.”

It seems odd to recall now, but the massive stockpiles of Tamiflu which have come in for so much criticism were originally purchased for bird flu. Indeed, it wasn’t until two Californian children developed flu-like illnesses in mid-April that officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta realised that a new swine flu virus was on the loose.

Scientists quickly began joining the dots, and when the CDC confirmed that the H1N1 subtype from the Californian cases was identical to a virus isolated from a five-year-old boy in the La Gloria outbreak, it automatically triggered a “phase five” alert.

At around the same time, the WHO published those new guidance notes, deleting the requirement that pandemic strains should cause “enormous morbidity and death”. This was part of an ongoing review of how it should define a pandemic. Henceforth, all that would be required was “sustained” transmission in at least two different parts of the world at the same time. The result was that on June 11, when it became clear that swine flu had spread to more than 70 countries, the WHO had no option but to declare a pandemic.

But Wendy Barclay, professor of virology at Imperial College London, who was present at many of the meetings where the change of definition was discussed, says it is a “nonsense” to make out, as Wodarg does, that it was a conspiracy. “The timing was coincidental,” she says. “The WHO was considering the change long before swine flu.” And in view of the initial reports from Mexico, which suggested unusual mortality patterns among young adults, she believes the WHO was right to call for the fast-track manufacture of vaccines. “The drug companies should be applauded for delivering the vaccines in record time,” she says.

Peter Openshaw, the director of the Centre for Respiratory Infection at Imperial College London, agrees with that verdict, pointing out that the fear at the time was that swine flu could prove as deadly as the 1918 “Spanish” influenza, another strain of H1N1 that killed an estimated 50 million people worldwide. Although he has reservations about the definition change, saying that pandemics should also be required to meet a “severity threshold”, he argues that “on balance it would have been irresponsible not to have taken the measures we did”.

Having said that, Prof Openshaw admits there are some things that should be done better next time. The Department of Health’s prediction in July that as many as 65,000 Britons could die over the winter was wrong, because scientists did not have accurate data. Initial reports suggested the virus was less widespread than it was, artificially elevating the death rate. However, a study just published in The Lancet, based on more extensive tests conducted over the summer, shows that, at that time, as many as one in three people in Britain were carrying the virus, 10 times more than could be estimated from the data available from hospitals and surgeries. As a result, the fatality rate has now been downgraded to a paltry 0.03 per cent, meaning that swine flu is 100 times less lethal than Spanish flu. “What we didn’t know at the time was that there were a large number of asymptomatic carriers,” explains Prof Openshaw.

Having said that, swine flu has tended to target people between the ages of 15 and 45, a group not normally at risk from seasonal flu, which has, the experts say, fully justified the NHS’s decision to provide early treatment with Tamiflu. In the United States, points out Prof Openshaw, those infected did not get antivirals until much later, and admissions of young adults to intensive care units have been far higher.

In fact, if anything, he believes we need to deliver antivirals and vaccines even faster next time – which is why he would like to see the NHS “iron out the bottlenecks” in its distribution system. That is a message seconded by Prof Oxford, who points to the “salutary” experience of Ukraine, where a huge surge in swine flu infections late last year brought the country’s medical system to its knees and had politicians scrabbling for supplies of Tamiflu and vaccines.

Prof Oxford also warns that the winter flu season is by no means over, and that vaccination could prove vital if, as he expects, H1N1 returns next year. “Swine flu is behaving in classic Darwinian fashion,” he says. “It has already displaced 99 per cent of the other flu viruses out there. My worry is that when it gets into the elderly next year, we could see many more deaths.” So far there have been 390 deaths in the UK.

No doubt Wodarg and his supporters will see this as a further example of scaremongering. The issue, they say, is not whether swine flu poses a risk but whether the risk is big enough to justify the diversion of precious funds to influenza vaccines, when diseases such as heart disease and hypertension kill many more people each year. And the row is not likely to be resolved any time soon. Although the government is now holding talks with GlaxoSmithKline to find a way of disposing of 60 million unwanted doses of vaccine, analysts predict that it and other vaccine manufacturers stand to make windfall profits of around £4 billion.

Yet rather than looking for scapegoats, Prof Barclay says we should be grateful that the pandemic turned out to be so mild. “In many ways, swine flu has been a dress rehearsal,” she says. “Next time, we may not be so fortunate.”

Advertisements

H1N1 needle blamed for partial paralysis

February 5, 2010

MICHELE MANDEL
Canoe.ca
February 1, 2010

Downstairs in the rehab wing of Markham Stouffville hospital, in a private room with a sunny window, lies Donna Hartlen, a young mother who is now partially paralyzed.

The Whitby woman can’t stand without leaning on a walker and her legs are too numb to allow her to walk for more than a few steps. The right side of her face is paralyzed, she can’t properly chew solid food and her right eye is bandaged because she can no longer blink to protect it.

Until five weeks ago, she was a perfectly healthy woman spending Christmas with her family in Nova Scotia. And then on Dec. 29 she was rushed to an emergency room in Halifax, suddenly unable to stand on feet.

The doctors diagnosed her with Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare neurological condition characterized by sudden weakness or paralysis. And while no one seems willing to discuss the likely cause, the 39-year-old knows exactly where the fault lies.

She blames the H1N1 flu shot she received on Dec. 13 – two weeks before her symptoms suddenly appeared.

Of course, there is no way to know for certain. But Hartlen has only grown more convinced since chatting by chance in the hall with the older gentleman from the hospital room next door.

// //

Don Gibson has GBS as well, with legs so numb now that he is confined to a wheelchair. It turns out that not only was he also vaccinated against H1N1, but he got the shot just two days before Hartlen, in the very same Markham doctors’ office.

“It’s way too coincidental,” insists the slight mom, her words slurred because the right side of her face will not move. “It’s either a bad batch or a lot more people are getting this than they are talking about.”

Her 80-year-old neighbour is equally convinced that the H1N1 vaccine to blame. “It must have been a bad batch,” Gibson believes. “But nobody is saying anything. I know I signed a piece of paper and there’s no liability but it’s pretty scary.”

They are now comrades in arms, an unlikely duo who share a rare illness and a similar vaccination history that no one wants to acknowledge.

According to the Public Health Agency, there are about 600-700 new GBS cases a year in Canada, caused usually by food-borne bacteria, respiratory infections or surgery.

“The risk of getting GBS after any flu vaccine is about one case for every million doses distributed,” the website says. “The benefit of the vaccine outweighs this theoretical risk.”

So far, the agency says they haven’t had any unusual spike in GBS – there’s been 22 cases following the H1N1 vaccination – or .87 per million doses distributed. But Hartlen questions how many GBS patients are actually being reported; she says she was the one who finally called her local public health department because no medical professional seemed interested in the possible connection.

“Not a single doctor we’ve talked with will even remotely discuss that it’s the H1N1 shot,” marvels Hartlen. “They almost pretend they don’t hear you. They don’t want to alarm the public and they don’t want you to stir up trouble.”

So GBS patients like Hartlen and Gibson are on their own.

Right now, Quebec is the only province with a no-fault vaccine injury compensation program in place.

“It’s a horror story of how little Ontario will do to help patients that come down with this after the government promotes it so much,” complains her husband, Wayne Burke.

They have two little girls at home, just 4 and 2. He works full-time at Telus; she was a self-employed business systems analyst. With no family in Whitby, they flew in her parents from Nova Scotia, but the elderly couple can’t look after the kids indefinitely.

Meanwhile, Hartlen has been told it can take months – and up to a year – before she completely regains all movement. So how is the partially-paralyzed mom supposed to take care of two young children until then?

“If my kids were 10 and 12 it would be different. But a four and two-year-old need 100% attention and I can’t give it to them,” she worries.

So she’s hardly unreasonable in expecting some kind of government support. But after countless phone conversations with every level of bureaucrat, she’s learned there will be no such thing.

“They’re the ones who push this vaccine. They promote it every five minutes on TV. So I do what they say and I get GBS and they’re not going to help me?

“I need help for my kids – I’m not looking for anything extravagant. I’m not an ambulance chaser. I don’t want to sue anybody. I just want to get my kids looked after while their father is at work.”

Instead, there is only a shameful silence.

Ukrainian Black Lung Death Toll Over 1000, Over A Quarter-Million Hospitalized

January 27, 2010

Vince Veneziani
The Business Insider
January 26, 2010

The mutated version of the H1N1 Swine Flu is truly wrecking havoc throughout Eastern Europe, with the Ukrainian death toll now clocking in at 1005 dead, according to Before It’s News.

And to make matters worse, over 250,000 have been hospitalized over the deadly flu strain; that number is set to rise.

Pharmaceutical companies accused of crying wolf over swine flu

January 26, 2010

Russia Today
January 25, 2010

Swine flu is under scrutiny once again as pharmaceutical companies are being accused of hyping up a “false pandemic”. The Council of Europe has put the virus on its winter agenda, which starts on Monday.

flu pandemic   Pharmaceutical companies accused of crying wolf over  swine flu

A representative from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe claims the World Health Organization colluded with major drug companies and changed the definition of “pandemic” to ensure maximum profits with no risks for the pharmaceutical firms.

If PACE is putting forward the theory that the swine flu hysteria was engineered by pharmaceutical companies to generate revenue, then Ukraine is a perfect example.

The first revelations of the flu epidemic in Ukraine back in October 2009 caused panic across the country. News of the pandemic dominated the agenda of most of the Ukrainian mass media.

Public reaction was so strong that all anti-flu products flew off the shelves of pharmacies and drug stores across the country.

In the first several weeks of the flu rush it was almost impossible to find any medication against it in the pharmacies due to panic buying. Of course, pharmaceutical companies in Ukraine profited from the hysteria. This continued until the late stages of November 2009.

The joint profits of all the pharmaceutical organizations in Ukraine in October 2009 alone amounted to over $200 million, which was more than they had earned during the entire year before.

Thoughts about the “epidemic outbreak” resurged right in the middle of the presidential election campaign in Ukraine. Public mood suggested that the epidemic was being used by politicians as one of the factors in the campaign in an attempt to gain more votes from the electorate.

The biggest controversy surrounds the antiviral drug Tamiflu, which was believed to be the most effective means of combating swine flu – not in the sense of actually preventing the disease, but curing a person already infected with the virus.

When the first delivery of 300 tons of Tamiflu was delivered to Ukraine, Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko revealed that some pharmacies had already sold the drug at ten times the original price. She declared that any private pharmacy which demands steep prices for the drug would suffer legal consequences.

Later on she announced that the Tamiflu drug that Ukraine had received from Switzerland will not go to pharmacies, but directly to hospitals to help those already infected with H1N1 (the proper term for swine flu).

Despite Tamiflu being presented as the most effective medicine against H1N1, a respectable British medical journal wrote later on that it was doubtful whether the medication could actually help anyone suffering from H1N1.

As it turned out, the number of those who died of swine flu in Ukraine turned out to be less than the country loses annually due to regular seasonal flu, so the supposed swine flu epidemic is of little concern now.

Currently, all registered flu-related deaths in Ukraine are attributed to the ordinary flu virus strain.

Since swine flu does not make it to the headlines anymore, it looks like the previously announced purchase of anti-flu vaccine from countries like Canada and Switzerland have been cancelled.

“It’s incredible what is happening”

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, the Chairman of the PACE Health Committee, told RT that the “World Health Organization is the institution that holds the biggest responsibility” for spreading news about “pandemic” swine flu.

“The WHO installed a private public partnership with pharmaceutical companies that started some eight years ago, and it seems that the pharmaceutical industry has very successfully influenced it because they had a lot profit with two false alarms of the WHO,” exclaimed Wodarg. “First, it was a bird’s flu alarm which never happened. Bird’s flu did not exist as a disease spread from one human being to another. And the second was the swine flu alarm, which was just a normal flu we experience every year, and even milder than most of the years.”

The expenses that followed the marketing used on scientists to impress governments to make contracts have already totaled billions of dollars, said Dr Wolfgang Wodarg.

Doctors Vaccinate for Profit

January 26, 2010

Christina England
VacTruth.com
January 25, 2010

Years ago children were sent up chimneys or sold as servants to earn their parents extra money. Now they are being vaccinated by doctors, to boost their takings. Doctors, Governments and Pharma see our children as their property and are making thousands of pounds/dollars/euros out of them right under our noses. This, they call ‘Health Care’, I call it the legalization of child labour.

For years now we have been told that vaccines are good for us, that vaccines eradicate illness and that vaccines will save us from killer diseases. What we are not told is that the doctors and Governments telling us this are often linked to the drug companies who are manufacturing the vaccines that they promote and many are making thousands of pounds/dollars profit from vaccinating our children.

Let us begin at the bottom and start with the GP. In the UK every time a vaccine is given to us by our trusted GP they are paid. The British Medical Journal published an article GPs make deals with local NHS to vaccinate children against swine fluexplaining how that every single child who is vaccinated with the H1N1 in the UK will earn the GP #5.25.

In Ireland the GP’s are paid five times this amount, for the seasonal flu shot. The article Irish Times – Irish GP’s paid five times UK rate for flu vaccine report that in Ireland a GP will earn a staggering [euro]38.95 per vaccine, making vaccines a very lucrative business indeed.

As far back as 2002, GP’s were so keen to get their hands on this extra money that they were striking off their lists the children who had not had the MMR because if they (the GP’s ) did not meet the Government target rate of 90% immunization, they would not earn their #2865 vaccination bonus Daily Telegraph – Children without MMR jab struck off GP’s list reports tells the full story.

In another article The campaign for Gardasil Flawed it is reported that Merck actually seeks out and trains doctors to lecture for them on Gardasil, paying them $4,500 each time they lecture on the Gardasil vaccine. Doctors are making thousands of dollars doing this.

This is nothing new and is not just attributed to vaccines. Doctors have been doing this for years.

In the article Ex-Drug Sales Rep Tells All – ABC News

one drugs representative spills the beans and tells a Congressional committee what really goes on. Speaking about Eli Lilly he told the committee:-

To sell their drugs, pharmaceutical companies hire former cheerleaders and ex-models to wine and dine doctors, exaggerate the drug’s benefits and underplay their side-effects”

Shahram Ahari, who spent two years selling Prozac and Zypraxa for Eli Lily, told a Senate Aging Committee chaired by Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wisc., that his job involved ” rewarding physicians with gifts and attention for their allegiance to your product and company despite what may be ethically appropriate.”

Ahari claimed that drug companies like hiring former cheerleaders and ex-models, as well as former athletes and members of the military, many of whom have no background in science to wine and dine the doctors explaining the wonderful benefits of the drug they are employed to sell.

Higher up the you have leading figures in the medical profession who advise Governments on vaccine policies have strong links and alliances with the drugs companies helping them peddle their wares.

The article Children Risk Untested Flu Vaccines in Hyped Pandemic – Child Health Safety shows some very interesting links with the key figures who advise our Governments and drug companies.

Dr Salisbury the Medical Director for the Department of Health and a key figure in the JCV I who advises the UK Government on vaccine policies is shown to be linked by association with drug companies.

“Dr Salisbury is also linked by association to drug companies. Dr Salisbury as the Medical Secretary for the Department of Health is also a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. The JCVI has the task of approving UK vaccines. Many JCVI members have declared interests in a variety of drug companies when discussing the flu pandemic [ “JCVI meeting on 13th February 2008]. These financial ties include vaccine manufacturers Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur and Novartis. The JCVI is reportedly involved in attempts to hide evidence that the MMR vaccine can cause brain inflammation and permanent brain damage. [“Vaccine E-Newsletter March 20, 2009 Vaccine Bullies & Fighting Back by Barbara Loe Fisher]“

Another Government figure found to be linked to drugs companies is Kathleen Sebelius The US Health and Human Services Secretary. She has been found to have strong links to Glaxo Smith Kline.

In early 2009 the US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told The Associated Press that she was urging school superintendents around the USA to spend the summer preparing for the possibility that schoolchildren could be first in line for swine flu vaccine in the fall, if the USA Government decided to go ahead with mass vaccinations:-

“If you think about vaccinating kids, schools are the logical place,” She said. [“Kids May Get Swine Flu Shot First Lauran Neergaard June 16th 2009]

However, she did promise careful surveillance. Sebelius has strong alliances to drug companies. [“GlaxoSmithKline website] announced her appointment stating that she could work with them to save ‘World Health’ and get out of the ‘Healthcare mess’, if they (GSK) gave the Government the ‘right attention’”

So can we trust the doctors and the Governments to keep our children safe? Sadly it seems that many are not really putting the safety of their patients before their ever increasing pay packets. Their loyalty is to the drug companies and not their patients, so what is the truth about the vaccinations used today?

Fortunately for us, we have a strong and growing army of ‘real doctors‘, who are less interested in the ‘nice little earners’ are more interested in keeping the public informed and safe. They have a very different view of what vaccines are doing to our health and our immune systems.

Dr Viera Scheibner a well trusted doctor, Principle Research Scientist (Rtd) and now prominent public campaigner,is so sure of her facts she sent a letter to the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper. This letter by Dr Viera Scheibner , was sent to and published in the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper, in February 1999.

She challenged Simon Chapman who wrote an article challenging the anti- vaccination movement in Australia to ‘TAKE HIS OWN MEDICINE’

She began by saying

“On February 19, 1999, the Medical Observer published an article by Simon Chapman, in which he issued a challenge to the anti-vaccination movement in Australia.

My response to his provocative article is as follows:

If vaccines are such a blessing I challenge Simon Chapman to appear on television and allow himself to be injected with all baby vaccines, adjusted to his body weight by a doctor of my choice and in my presence.

The vaccines to be administered to Simon are as follows:

* DtaP: 3 doses within 4 months
* Hib (any conjugates): 3 doses within 4 months

* OPV or IPV: 3 doses within 4 months
* Hep B: 3 doses within 1 month of each other.

The time of the first dose represents month 0.

There isn’t a better way to demonstrate to us that vaccines are safe and effective than by Simon taking his own medicine.

Seems fair enough to me but as expected her letter was never answered.

Dr Scheibner has always had very strong views on vaccination and has been quoted making the following statements:-

Vaccination procedures are a highly politically motivated non-science, whose practitioners are only interested in injecting multitudes of vaccines without much interest or care as to their effects. Data collection on reactions to vaccines is only paid lip service, and the obvious ineffectiveness of vaccines to prevent diseases is glossed over. The fact that natural infectious diseases have beneficial effect on the maturation and development of the immune system is ignored or deliberately suppressed. Consequently, parents of small children and any potential recipients of vaccines and any orthodox medications should be wary of any member of the medical establishment (which is little more than a highly politicised business system) extolling the non-existent virtues of vaccination.”–Viera Scheibner

“I did not find it difficult to conclude that there is no evidence whatsoever that vaccines or any kind are effective in preventing the infectious diseases they are supposed to prevent. Further, adverse effects are amply documented and are far more significant to public health than any adverse effects of infectious diseases. Immunizations not only did not prevent any infectious diseases, they caused more suffering and more deaths than has any other human activity in the entire history of medical intervention. It will be decades before the mopping-up after the disasters caused by childhood vaccination will be completed.”—Dr. Viera Scheibner, PhD

She is not the only doctor to hold such strong views. Dr Harold Buttram M.D holds similar views. He has said:-

“Safety studies on vaccinations are limited to short time periods only: several days to several weeks. There are NO (NONE) long term (months or years) safety studies on any vaccination or immunization. For this reason, there are valid grounds for suspecting that many delayed-type vaccine reactions may be taking place unrecognized at to their true nature.Dr Buttram MD

“As reported in a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine in 1984, tests of T-lymphocyte subpopulations were done on 11 healthy adults before-and-after routine tetanus booster immunizations. Tests showed a significant though temporary drop in T-helper lymphocytes (a class of white blood cells which helps govern the immune system) in all of the subjects. Special concern rests in the fact that in 4 of the subjects the T-helper cells fell to levels found in active AIDS patients. (2) If this was the result of a single vaccine in healthy adults, it is sobering to think of the consequences of the multiple vaccines (twenty-one at last count) routinely given to infants with their immature systems during the first six months of life. However, we can only speculate as to the consequences, as this test has never been repeated. Dr Buttram MD

The list of doctors and professionals stating that vaccines are dangerous is growing. Dr Sherri Tenpenny says in a short article  Defending the Right to Poison

“I have a little person in my office who had 10 rounds of antibiotics and 17 vaccines by 20 months of age. Yes, now autistic. That should be assault with deadly weapons and the doctor should be in jail. Instead, the parents were kicked out of their pediatrician’s practice for refusing more vaccines and wanting to get their child well. With these annoying, non-compliant parents out of the way, that doctor can continue to do what vaccinators do: Inject toxic substances into children, ruining their health and the lives of the child’s family members”

Dr Mayer Eisenstein Homefirst Medical Services treats thousands of never- vaccinated children. The Homefirst Medical Services director has said on many occasions that he is not aware of any cases of autism in unvaccinated children.

Dr Eisenstein said that the Homefirst Medical Services has taken care of about 30,000 to 35,000 unvaccinated children over the years and he does not remember a single case of autism in children who never received vaccines

For over 30 years Dr. Eisenstein has been fighting the good fight against vaccinations and struggling to legitimize alternative therapies. In recent years the evidence about the fantastic healing properties of Vitamin D has captured his attention along with that of other meaningful supplements which promote better health naturally. On his live radio show, he dispenses his wisdom and knowledge while his ever more popular Webinars continue to bring on great guests to tackle the most controversial health issues of the day

Recently in a disgusted interview he said-

“Now They Want to Inject Our Children with 2 Doses of H1N1 Vaccine!!! Not My Children!! …How pathetic! Tested on 474 children, and they want to give it to millions of children! Since the public overwhelmingly is rejecting this ineffective and dangerous vaccine the government needed to come up with a plan so as not to be accused of pork spending for a “pork vaccine”. Now I know what the Obama administration is planning to do with the millions of unused Swine Flu vaccines that they purchased. They will give 2 doses to our children and if that does not work they will give 3 doses. Just Say No!”— Mayer Eisenstein MD, JD, MPH

Another real doctor is Dr Andrew Moulden who has said for years that vaccinations cause MASS Ischemia: Cellular Injury and the ischemic Penumbra – the progression of hypoxia in the Brain – Cores” neural tracts from the inside out. He says that this creates a series of disconnections to the brain’s wiring – locally and or systemically (autism) to progressively (dementia) and intermittently (Multiple sclerosis, CIDP, ADEM)..and more..including autistic enterocolitis and bowel disorders.

He explains everything on his website BrainGuard and shows fascinating videos that prove his theories.

Dr Mark Geier is another real doctor who is more interested in the welfare of children and the right to information than lining his own pocket. He has been fighting against mercury in vaccinations for years. For his beliefs the Governments and Big Pharma have trashed his reputation and even taken him to court but like many other professionals speaking on these issues, he battles on, speaking recently at a Mercury Free Vaccine Rally out side the CDC building in front of hundreds of parents with autistic children.

He believes that it is the Mercury in the vaccines that causes Autism and has advocated for many years to rid all vaccinations of Mercury.

The real doctors are the ones who turn their back on dirty dealings and who remember their Hippocratic Oath. This is an old oath historically taken by doctors swearing to ethically practice medicine. It is widely believed to have been written by Hippocrates the father of western medicine, in Ionic Greek (late 5th century BC), or by one of his students, and is usually included in the Hippocratic Corpus. The phrase “first do no harm” said in Latin as Primum non nocere is often, incorrectly, attributed to the oath. Although mostly of historical and traditional value, the oath is considered a rite of passage for practitioners of medicine in some countries, although nowadays the modernized version of the text varies among the countries.

The Hippocratic Oath (orkos) is one of the most widely known of Greek medical texts. It requires a new physician to swear upon a number of healing gods that he will uphold a number of professional ethical standards.

The Oath says nothing about having links to drugs companies and lining ones pockets at the possible expense of the patient and it says nothing about injecting patients with doses of lethal cocktails of poisons and hoping for the best.

The real doctors are the ones that are not afraid to stand up and fight for the the rights of their patient. The real doctors ‘first do no harm’ and do not put money before the safety of our children.

What ’skeptics’ really believe about vaccines, medicine, consciousness and the universe

January 25, 2010

Mike Adams
Natural News
January 24, 2010

In the world of medicine, “skeptics” claim to be the sole protectors of intellectual truth. Everyone who disagrees with them is just a quack, they insist. Briefly stated, “skeptics” are in favor of vaccines, mammograms, pharmaceuticals and chemotherapy. They are opponents of nutritional supplements, herbal medicine, chiropractic care, massage therapy, energy medicine, homeopathy, prayer and therapeutic touch.

featured stories   What skeptics really believe about vaccines,  medicine, consciousness and the universe
featured stories   What skeptics really believe about vaccines,  medicine, consciousness and the universe
Drones are not equal to a being of energy with a consciousness and a soul, inhabiting a human body with purpose and awareness.

But there’s much more that you need to know about “skeptics.” As you’ll see below, they themselves admit they have no consciousness and that there is no such thing as a soul, a spirit or a higher power. There is no life after death. In fact, there’s not much life in life when you’re a skeptic.

What skeptics really believe

I thought it would be interesting to find out exactly what “skeptics” actually believe, so I did a little research and pulled this information from various “skeptic” websites. What I found will make you crack up laughing so hard that your abs will be sore for a week. Take a look…

• Skeptics believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective (even if they’ve never been tested), that ALL people should be vaccinated, even against their will, and that there is NO LIMIT to the number of vaccines a person can be safely given. So injecting all children with, for example, 900 vaccines all at the same time is believed to be perfectly safe and “good for your health.”

• Skeptics believe that fluoride chemicals derived from the scrubbers of coal-fired power plants are really good for human health. They’re so good, in fact, that they should be dumped into the water supply so that everyone is forced to drink those chemicals, regardless of their current level of exposure to fluoride from other sources.

• Skeptics believe that many six-month-old infants need antidepressant drugs. In fact, they believe that people of all ages can be safely given an unlimited number of drugs all at the same time: Antidepressants, cholesterol drugs, blood pressure drugs, diabetes drugs, anti-anxiety drugs, sleeping drugs and more — simultaneously!

• Skeptics believe that the human body has no ability to defend itself against invading microorganism and that the only things that can save people from viral infections are vaccines.

• Skeptics believe that pregnancy is a disease and childbirth is a medical crisis. (They are opponents of natural childbirth.)

• Skeptics do not believe in hypnosis. This is especially hilarious since they are all prime examples of people who are easily hypnotized by mainstream influences.

• Skeptics believe that there is no such thing as human consciousness. They do not believe in the mind; only in the physical brain. In fact, skeptics believe that they themselves are mindless automatons who have no free will, no soul and no consciousness whatsoever.

• Skeptics believe that DEAD foods have exactly the same nutritional properties as LIVING foods (hilarious!).

• Skeptics believe that pesticides on the crops are safe, genetically modified foods are safe, and that any chemical food additive approved by the FDA is also safe. There is no advantage to buying organic food, they claim.

• Skeptics believe that water has no role in human health other than basic hydration. Water is inert, they say, and the water your toilet is identical to water from a natural spring (assuming the chemical composition is the same, anyway).

• Skeptics believe that all the phytochemicals and nutrients found in ALL plants are inert, having absolutely no benefit whatsoever for human health. (The ignorance of this intellectual position is breathtaking…)

• Skeptics believe that the moon has no influence over life on Earth. Farming in sync with moon cycles is just superstition, they say. (So why are the cycles of life for insects, animals and humans tied to the moon, then?)

• Skeptics believe that the SUN has no role in human health other than to cause skin cancer. They completely deny any healing abilities of light.

• Skeptics believe that Mother Nature is incapable of synthesizing medicines. Only drug companies can synthesize medicines, they claim. (So why do they copy molecules from nature, then?)

• Skeptics do not believe in intuition. They believe that mothers cannot “feel” the emotions of their infants at a distance. They write off all such “psychic” events as mere coincidence.

• Skeptics believe that all healing happens from the outside, from doctors and technical interventions. They do not believe that patients have any ability to heal themselves. Thus, they do not ascribe any responsibility for health to patients. Rather, they believe that doctors and technicians are responsible for your health. Anyone who dismisses doctors and takes charge of their own health is therefore acting “irresponsibly,” they claim.

• Skeptics believe that cell phone radiation poses absolutely no danger to human health. A person can be exposed to unlimited cell phone radiation without any damage whatsoever.

• Skeptics believe that aspartame and artificial chemical sweeteners can be consumed in unlimited quantities with no ill effects.

• Skeptics believe that human beings were born deficient in synthetic chemicals and that the role of pharmaceutical companies is to “restore” those deficiencies in humans by convincing them to swallow patented pills.

• Skeptics believe that you can take unlimited pharmaceuticals, be injected with an unlimited number of vaccines, expose yourself to unlimited medical imaging radiation, consume an unlimited quantity of chemicals in processed foods and expose yourself to an unlimited quantity of environmental chemical toxins with absolutely no health effects whatsoever!

All the beliefs listed above were compiled from “skeptics” websites. (I’m not going to list those websites here because they don’t deserve the search engine rankings, but you can find them yourself through Google, if you wish.)

Skeptics aren’t consistently skeptical

If you really look closely at the beliefs of “skeptics,” you discover their skepticism is selective. They’re really skeptical about some things — like vitamins — but complete pushovers on others such as the scientific credibility of drug company studies.

Here are some of the many things that “skeptics” should be skeptical about, but aren’t:

• Skeptics aren’t skeptical about the corruption and dishonesty in the pharmaceutical industry. They believe whatever the drug companies say, without asking a single intelligent question.

• Skeptics aren’t skeptical about medical journals. They believe whatever they read in those journals, even when much of it turns out to be complete science fraud.

• Skeptics aren’t skeptical about the profit motive of the pharmaceutical industry. They believe that drug companies are motivated by goodwill, not by profits.

• Skeptics aren’t skeptical about the motivations and loyalties of the FDA. They will swallow, inject or use any product that’s FDA approved, without a single reasonable thought about the actual safety of those products.

• Skeptics aren’t skeptical about the safety of synthetic chemicals used in the food supply. They just swallow whatever poisons the food companies dump into the foods.

• Skeptics aren’t skeptical about the enormous dangers of ionizing radiation from mammograms and CT scans. They have somehow convinced themselves that “early detection saves live” when, in reality, “early radiation causes cancer.”

• Skeptics aren’t skeptical about the mass-drugging agenda of the psychiatric industry which wants to diagnose everyone with some sort of “mental” disorder. The skeptics just go right along with it without asking a single commonsense question about whether the human brain really needs to be “treated” with a barrage of mind-altering chemicals.

• Skeptics aren’t skeptical about mercury fillings. What harm could mercury possibly do anyway? If the ADA says they’re safe, they must be!

• Skeptics aren’t skeptical about the demolition-style collapse of the World Trade Center 7 building on September 11, 2001 — a building that was never hit by airplanes. This beautifully-orchestrated collapse of a hardened structure could only have been accomplished with precision explosives. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwSc…) Astonishingly, “skeptics” have little understanding of the laws of physics. Concrete-and-steel buildings don’t magically collapse in a perfect vertical demolition just because of a fire on one floor…

• Skeptics aren’t skeptical about the safety of non-stick cookware, or the dangers of cleaning chemicals in the home, or the contamination of indoor air with chemical fumes from carpets, paints and particle board furniture. To the skeptics, the more chemicals, the better!

Nature is bad, chemicals are good

Summing up the position of the “skeptics” is quite simple: Nature is bad, chemicals are good!

If we only had more chemicals injected into more babies, the world would be a better place, they say. If we could only ban all plants, herbs, vitamins and supplements, we’d all be so much healthier because then we’d take more pharmaceuticals!

Seriously. This is what they believe. They openly admit this is their position.

And all you people drinking green smoothies, and growing your own food, and getting natural sunlight, and taking care of your own health, and drinking herbal tea… well you’re all just fools, say the skeptics. You’re all just too stupid to understand “real” science. Because if you understood real science, you’d give up all those useless herbs and superfoods and healing vegetables and you’d be taking twenty different prescription medications instead.

Then you’d be really smart, see. Because all those chemicals make you healthy and smart. A few extra vaccine injections will make you even smarter. Then you can join the skeptics because you’re smart enough at that point to understand that chemicals are the answer to all of life’s problems: Depression, anxiety, digestion, sexual performance, sleep, even test-taking abilities… there’s a chemical “solution” to every problem you might experience.

What skeptics really are

I hope it’s fairly obvious to you by now that skeptics are the most misinformed people on the planet.

They are the easiest people to fool. They’re the easiest to hypnotize, too, because they lack independent thinking skills. Rather than thinking for themselves, they have joined a “club of skeptics” where they can be told what to think and then label themselves “intelligent” for following others in the group.

These are the people who line up to be injected with useless H1N1 vaccines. (The joke is on them, of course. Those vaccines were a complete fraud…) These are the people who stand in line at the pharmacy to buy a dozen different prescriptions (costing sometimes thousands of dollars) that their doctors told them to take. These are the people who eat processed, dead junk food laced with chemicals that make them sick — and then they wonder why they’re sick. These are the people who sit at home watching television and think to themselves how smart they are because they follow the medical advice they learned in drug company advertisements.

These are the real “skeptics.” They are so incredibly isolated from reality that they don’t even believe in their body’s own ability to heal itself.

Skeptics don’t believe in a higher power of any kind: No God, no spirit, no angels, no guides, no creative force in the universe… nada. They think the universe is a cold, empty, lonely, stupid place full of soulless, mindless, zombie biological bodies who have no free will and no consciousness.

Gee, no wonder these skeptics are so misguided. They have the most pessimistic view possible. No wonder they seek to destroy themselves with chemicals — they don’t even think they’re alive to begin with! Skeptics are bent on self destruction. And they believe that when you die, the lights just go out and you cease to exist. Nothing happens after that. You’re just a mindless biological robot whose life has no meaning, no purpose, no higher self.

This is exactly what the skeptics believe. They’ll even tell you so themselves!

Never argue with drones

Realizing this, it makes it so much easier to debate with skeptics on any topic. Whatever they say, you just answer, “WHO is saying that? Are YOU, a conscious, free-thinking person with a mind and soul saying that, or are those words simply being automatically and robotically uttered from the mouth of a bag of bones and skin that has no mind and no soul?”

If they answer you honestly, they will have to admit that they believe they are nothing more than a robotic bag of bones and skin that is mindlessly uttering whatever nonsense happens to escape their mechanical lips. At that point, you’ve already won the debate because YOU have a soul, and THEY don’t. You’re arguing with a mindless robot.

Seriously. Think about this deeply. If you believe what the skeptics want you to believe (because they are always right, of course), then you must accept the fact that THEY have no consciousness. They are not really “alive.” They are just robotic biological machines. They are drones, in other words. And drones are not equal to a being of energy with a consciousness and a soul, inhabiting a human body with purpose and awareness.

Never argue with drones. You only waste your time and annoy the drone.

Skeptics… zombies… drones… different words for the same thing. Soulless, mindless, lacking consciousness and free will, having no awareness of the value of life… these are the skeptics arguing for vaccines, mammograms and chemotherapy today. They are agents of death who can only find solace in an industry of death — the industry of modern medicine.

PharmaMedia to Squelch EU Council’s Secret Investigation into H1N1 Vaccine Fraud and Global Genocide

January 25, 2010

Sherri Kane
Natural Family Blog
January 23, 2010

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) will hold a secret hearing next week into the apparent manipulation by BigPharma of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global H1N1 flu campaign. Experts predict the secrecy will be maintained by the PharmaMedia that controls mainstream news.

The PACE hearing currently advancing was prompted by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, chief of health in the Council of Europe representing 47 countries. This inquiry will address the drug cartel’s “false flag” pandemic, and the WHO’s scandalous promotions of swine flu vaccinations that were “fast tracked,” inadequately tested, and now causing more harm than good.

The sanctioned vaccines and drugs, such as Tamiflu, are burdening governments financially and poisoning people globally, experts say.

During my interview of Dr. Wodarg on January 14th,  he mentioned he wasnot re-elected by the German people last September.  Studying his previous investigations into criminal drug industry operations and cover-ups, it is likely his defeat was rigged.

“As head of the subcommittee for health,”  Dr. Wodarg reported from his home in Germany, “I made the motion. and there will be investigations. . . .

“Many countries in Europe are very angry about what the WHO did and how they decided to have a pandemic when there was just a mild flu; and this whole thing was in favor of those companies who had prepared the pandemic plans, and who only needed the judgment of the WHO to have them set in power, and to earn them money,” Dr. Wodarg explained.

The Council is expected to consider the sudden inexplicable proclamations of  H1N1 vaccine shortages instigated by BigPharma’s advertising gurus paid to respond to widespread distrust of the manufactured flu fright and vaccine sales hype.

Global pandemic promoters used frightful messages to convince scientists, doctors, and global populations that pandemic H1N1 threatened to kill millions. Instead, the virus caused only a tiny fraction of deaths reported during a normal flu season.

PharmaMedia to Squelch Crimes

Many observers believe the urgently needed investigation is unlikely to make any significant difference in public perceptions since drug industrialists have a knack for steering their allies in  the media clear of controversy; especially this kind of explosive scandal.

“PharmaMedia controls the mass mind more effectively than any covert psychological operation in world history,” said Dr. Leonard Horowitz, a Harvard-trained media expert and world leading vaccine risk analyst. Dr. Horowitz is also the Editor-in-Chief of Medical Veritas journal.

Few people realize the connections between major drug companies that produce H1N1 vaccines and media moguls on the boards of directors of BigPharma’s leading companies.

According to Dr. Horowitz, media moguls spin the news and mass mindset impacting geopolitics, economics, and governmental policies on behalf of BigPharma because they are heavily invested in the drug cartel. News blackouts and promotional propaganda are all that is needed to maintain the status quo in favor of ongoing fraud and mass murder. This is his conclusion based on rock solid evidence his colleagues and contributors have published in the peer review science journal Medical Veritas.

What if Dr. Wodarg, Dr. Horowitz, and the Health Minister of Poland, Dr. Ewa Kopacz, who rejected the vaccine hype and sales contracts because of the obvious fraud, are all right?

Who Ordered the Shortage Marketing?

To diagnose this surreal tragedy accurately, one need only consider the source of the shortage marketing directive. There was a dramatic orchestrated change in global media promotions the third week of October. Investigators must ponder why adequate supplies of vaccines widely acknowledged before October 16, 2009, suddenly disappeared following a Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) meeting on this subject held in New York on this date.

The “H1N1 Pandemic Study Group” meeting was led by Laurie Garrett–anoted journalist whose works exemplify PharmaMedia’s methods of conducting white collar bio-terrorism and psychological warfare. Her messages, like other authors “selected” for media stardom, create markets and stimulate sales for the petrochemical-pharmaceutical cartel, especially through lucrative sales of vaccines and drugs following frights.

Garrett’s study group decided that the most effective response to the public’s overwhelming aversion to getting vaccinated was to feign a vaccine shortage. One week later, the media, led by Thomas Glocer’s Reuters News Service and Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, suddenly declared the alleged shortages.

It turns out that Murdoch, directing most powerfully the influential media, including Fox News, the Associated Press (AP), Twentieth Century Fox, Time Warner, and much more, controls the Murdoch Childrens’ Research Institute (MCRI) in Australia, responsible for the first H1N1 Swine flu tests on children 6 months to 8 years of age.

Murdoch’s son, and heir apparent, James, the Chairman and Chief Executive of News Corporation for Europe and Asia, is an overseer of  GlaxoSmithKline’s Board of Directors. They are one of six companies that make H1N1 vaccines.

Rupert’s mother, Elisabeth Murdoch, is the grand matriarch of the Royal Victoria Women’s Hospital in Melbourne.  Its staff collaborated with CSL Pharmaceuticals, another H1N1 vaccine maker. CSL is owned by Merck & Co. They used flawed testing methods on pregnant women, doctors say. Their safety tests lacked legitimate placebo controls and evaded long-term surveillance and data collection. The missing data prevented credible scientific analysis.  Thus, BigPharma had nothing to substantiate their liberally-issued safety assurances. In other words, PharmaMedia conducted an obvious case of scientific fraud and public deception for vaccine market proliferation.

Thomas Glocer, the CEO of Reuters, is also on the Board of Directors of Merck & Co., and a partner with Rupert Murdoch in the Partnership for New York City that personifies the heart of this drug ring. The partners profitably advance biotechnology and “genetopharmaceuticals” globally, more than any other consortium.

This PFNYC was founded by David Rockefeller who controls the CFR and World Health Organization (WHO). Rockefeller-approved Co-Chairs of the PFNYC include Rupert Murdoch and Lloyd Blankfein, the chief of Goldman Sachs who financed the merger of MedImmune and Astrozeneca, producers of FLUMIST–the nasal spray H1N1 vaccine. Blankfein holds millions, perhaps billions, of dollars of the company’s stock.

“Now these unholy alliances have yet to be acknowledged adequately because these H1N1 vaccine investors have zero reason to expose themselves,” Dr. Horowitz said. “So regardless of what PACE investigators find, these PFNYC partners will either spin their stories suitably, or neglect them entirely, leaving populations clueless about what is really happening behind BigPharma’s deceptive media.”

“The goal of our work,” Dr. Wordarg revealed, “is to reinstill trust into very important health organizations we need–such organizations who will cooperate internationally, and who are important in the network of international knowledge about possible health dangers.”

“But this influenza was twice blown up,” the German medical chief continued, “once as a bird flu, and the second time as the swine flu. There was no scientific evidence for either.”

Genetic Mutation Risking Human Extinction

The most urgent troublesome investigation to be conducted by PACE, and the least likely story to be told by PharmaMedia, involves the FLUMIST vaccine. It transmits “live” “active” unstable viruses–clones of H1N1; mutants created in drug labs–that are passed from vaccinated persons to others not infected. These transmissions risk genetic mutations all along the way.

“Stupid is as stupid does,” said Rev. Roxanne Hampton, referring to the gullable people who consented to get vaccinated and now pose a risk to their family, community, and even the entire human race due to the genetic mutation risks. As a legislative aid in Hawaii who helped the Big Island’s County Council investigate the H1N1 vaccine hype and its risks, Rev. Hampton has advised government attorneys of the fraud committed by local health officials. “I pray they will take action similar to the investigation that PACE is advancing in Europe,” she added.

According to Dr. Harold Buttram, and his latest report in the Winter 2010 issue of Medical Veritas, this pandemic flu operation has already exposed millions of healthy people to genetic mutation risks beyond deadly side effects caused by these injections.

Other experts report that recombinations of H1N1 are expected with more deadly viruses in circulation. Even human DNA risks mutations from infections with bioengineered H1N1s. These risks threaten civilization with extinction according to many avid investigators, doctors, and concerned scientists.

Vaccine truth activist Ingri Cassel of Vaccination Liberation Organization (www.VacLib.org) claims that vaccines were born in fraud and have been laying the foundation for sick and diseased populations ever since.

“New vaccines on the market are claimed to be more sterile, laboratory tested and safer,” Ms. Cassel said. “Nothing can be further from the truth. All vaccines are mutagenic by nature–including the highly unstable triple recombinant vaccines–which are changing our genetic code. When one looks at the whole picture, vaccines represent an attack on our God-given right to natural immunity and genetic integrity. This genocidal madness needs to be halted and the real criminals–vaccine manufacturers and their promoters–held accountable.”

Medimmune and other pharmaceutical companies have recalled millions of doses of vaccines in recent weeks, including FLUMIST nasal spray due to its alleged “inadequate shelf life.” But critics assert this is a distraction given the aforementioned risks of genetic annihilation. There are more pressing problems including increasing sterilization, Ms. Cassel reports.

“I have an eye on this,” Dr. Wodarg said, considering the many outspoken doctors and activists who have written objections and public alerts about genetic threats of H1N1 vaccinations.

“There will be more in France, and there will be more perhaps in Australia and Switzerland. The Polish people have been very critical to vaccinations. They didn’t buy these vaccines. The health minister of Poland has a public health background. She’s a doctor, and Poland is the only country that said no to WHO, and didn’t follow the pandemic frenzy. They didn’t buy the vaccines because they thought they were too dangerous.”

Oversupplies Trouble Governments

According to European news sources, because the vast majority of world villagers have refused these vaccines, governments cannot dispose of their stockpiles. They literally cannot give away the H1N1 vaccines that cost billions of dollars to purchase just a few months ago during the feigned emergency.

So health officials have also been pitching their excessive vaccine stocks more suspiciously and aggressively to broader markets.

On Friday, January 15, USA Today evidenced health officials resorting to media blitzes alleging the need for follow-up injections. The weak yet risky first doses of H1N1 vaccines taken by millions of people are inadequate alone, they warned, for protection against a virus admittedly causing less than 6 percent of the fatalities from a normal seasonal flu.

According to the Murdoch-AP-influenced Hawaii Star Bulletin, the H1N1 vaccines are now being offered to everyone. The plentiful injectables are now suitable for even low risk groups, health officials claim.

The determination of “risk groups” came from supposed reported cases collected by the CDC early in the pandemic. Later it was learned that their data was overblown by 84-97% according to a CBS News investigation widely publicized in late October, 2009. Thus, there is no good reason to assume the risk groups were identified legitimately.

Dr. Horowitz, who was the first investigator in the world to declare the alleged H1N1 pandemic was a scam, balked at the risk of vaccinating pregnant women with mercury preserved formulas. “Vaccinations,” he noted, “have traditionally been elective procedures for pregnant women respecting sensitive rapidly-growing fetal nerves.”

Neurotoxic mercury affects fetal neurology most powerfully, researchers say. Infant growth and development, and neurobehavioral disorders including autism, are risked by Thimerosal mercury-laced injections.

Dr. Horowitz was also among the first to raise concerns that new H1N1 vaccine adjuvants containing Nonoxynol-9 spermicide might cause abortions. This neglected warning has resulted in possibly a thousand H1N1-induced miscarriages to date.

“We are up to about 200 women who have had H1N1 vaccine-triggered spontaneous abortions according to records we are mailing to American legislators,” said Eileen Dannemann, Director of the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW). NCOW is calling for an official American investigation in step with the European Parliament’s Council.

Spontaneous abortions are being reported to NCOW daily, Ms. Dannemann reported, “And this is only by word-of-mouth, without word getting out in the media. We’ve asked grieving moms to contact us to file their reports.”

CDC officials admit they collect only about 10% of vaccine injuries. They call these “adverse events.” Spontaneous abortions are included. So if our current count is nearly 200, and this represents only about 10%, the actual miscarriages to date number, very conservatively, approximately a thousand.”

With such high numbers of terminated pregnancies, for all we know the addition of abortifacients into H1N1 vaccines, ingredients that cause spontaneous miscarriages, evidences a population control exercise. Previously considered “unspeakable,” this is now possible since leading vaccine industrialists, and chief health officials, including Barack Obama’s Science Czar, John Holdren, endorse and finance the  Population Council whose efforts advance rapid widespread depopulation using vaccinations for sterilization. Holdren wrote about this in his 1977 co-authored book, EcoScience, and this was done in the past with vaccines poisoned with HCG, a female pregnancy hormone.

The Population Council also tested and licensed RU-486, the “abortion pill,” sadistically named to refer to the slang question, “Are you for 86-ing (trashing) life?” Dr. Horowitz notes.

Adding to the public’s distrust of governing health officials, in Hawaii, Director of Public Health, Chiyome Fukino, who is a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Philadelphia attorney Phil Berg for concealing evidence required to certify President Barack Obama’s official birth certificate, falsely testified to legislators last year that H1N1 vaccines were adequately tested.

Fukino alleged some magic “threshold” of “herd immunity” determined that unvaccinated persons pose a “serious threat” to vaccinated people. Due to her fraudulent claims, State attorneys have been asked by County of Hawaii Council Co-chair, Emily Naeole-Beason, to investigate Dr. Fukino for fraud, official malfeasance, and genocidal malpractices.

Strict whistleblower statutes criminalize false claims made to governing officials costing governments millions of dollars for vaccines and drugs fraudulently promoted. Fukino purchased millions of dollars of Tamiflu and FLUMIST for the State. Now she may face criminal charges pending an official investigation.

“We have a very powerful investigation advancing,” in the EU, said Dr. Wodarg. He cited “the very doubtful way the WHO acted, and the whole matter, of the H1N1 scandal.”

“I think we should start with this [obvious breach of faith],” the retiring health chief of PACE said of the manufactured flu frenzy. “I am open to investigating to find out more,” Dr. Wodarg concluded, referencing the little publicized connections between the makers of H1N1 vaccines and the media manipulators with private equity investments in these vaccinations.

How Did School Staffers Get Insulin Instead of Flu Vaccine?

January 24, 2010

JOSEPH BROWNSTEIN
ABC News
Jan. 21, 2010

When staff members at a Wellesley, Mass., school went to the nurse last Friday, they expected to be injected with a vaccine for theH1N1 flu. What they received instead was a shot of insulin resulting in a bout with low blood sugar.

While the staffers seem to be suffering no long-term damage from mistakenly receiving the insulin injections, investigations are ongoing to determine what caused the medical error. Indications thus far have been that a school nurse was responsible. The nurse has been temporarily relieved of duty.

While ABC News contacted people at the departments of health for the town of Wellesley and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, as well as the Wellesley School District, it remains unclear how the flu vaccine, which can be distributed in pre-filled syringes or vials, was mistaken for insulin, which is drawn from a vial because each dose needs to be calibrated when it is given.

Such errors have happened before. This past fall, a number of people in the neighboring town of Needham received a seasonal flu vaccine in place of the H1N1 vaccines they were supposed to receive. And in 2007, a teacher in the nearby town of Attleboro also received an injection of insulin instead of the intended flu shot.

“Mistakes can always be made,” said Lisa Lowery, a registered nurse and immunizations program manager for the Visiting Nurse Service in Indianapolis. While she is reluctant to blame the nurse, she said other steps can be taken to avoid such a problem.

The benefit of having a nurse specifically performing a vaccination clinic, according to Lowery, is that it allows the nurse to be more focused. “You’re in a habit of doing what you’re doing. You’re doing one vaccine and only one vaccine,” she said.

“In practices, you’re taught to take the bottle to another nurse and have her double-check what you’re about to give,” she said — a situation that isn’t possible when a school nurse alone is administering vaccine.

“That nurse is not used to injecting vaccines as a school nurse,” said Lowery. “It would have been her habit to pick up insulin. Having someone to back them up and check them out would have prevented some more errors. If you’re holding a vaccination clinic, use someone who’s used to doing that.”

Kay Renny, a registered nurse and manager of community programs for the Visiting Nurse Association of Southeast Michigan in Detroit said other steps are typically taken to avoid such a problem.

She said when her nurses are giving out both seasonal and swine flu vaccines, they do so in two separate lines with two separate forms, which do not look alike, so that nurses — who are only administering one shot — will notice. “This is the first year where we’re administering two flu vaccines at the same time,” she said, explaining it presented a new challenge.

When a mistake happens, “It doesn’t hurt them, but it doesn’t help them. What they want is what they’re there for,” said Renny. “You try to put steps in place to avoid that happening.”

She noted that the vials for insulin and flu vaccine are similar but the syringes are different, with those for insulin being smaller. “Whenever administering any kind of medication, you have to double check when you have multiple kinds of medication in front of you. You really need to double check your double check.”

Possible Fallout

While no one seems to be suffering long-term consequences from the medical error, adverse events are always possible with insulin being needlessly injected, since it drops the blood-sugar levels.

“It’s basically going to make them hypoglycemic,” said Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president for medical affairs for the American Diabetes Association. “That might cause anything from just feeling shaky and jittery and hungry all the way down to making it difficult to think.”

Kirkman explained that a person can become unconscious if their blood-sugar drops too low, but noted that this type of error could be corrected by certain injections or “you can have the person eat carbohydrates to bring the blood sugar back up,” depending on the severity.

It remains unclear what, if any, impact this incident will have on public demand for flu vaccine.

Both nurses seemed to think, however, that the incident, while unfortunate, would likely improve safety in people still getting vaccinated without reducing the number of people willing to get the shot.

//

“When you have stories out there, then people are going to be asking the person administering — the nurse — what are you giving me?” said Renny. “What I think it does is help the administrator administer the right vaccine, because it’s forefront in their mind.”

“I do think people who are actively going to seek a shot are going to be proactive about asking the nurse, which is a good thing,” said Lowery. At the same time, she said, “We still need to encourage the public to get both their H1N1 vaccination,” noting that it remains unclear if H1N1 will return and the traditional peak of seasonal flu has not yet arrived.

“Don’t let an incident as isolated as this affect your choice,” she said. “Make sure you get vaccinated and prepare for the flu season.”

More Answers Needed

One complicating issue that has not been resolved yet is how the error was made, given that the H1N1 doses had come in prefilled syringes, while insulin doses are filled at the time from a vial.

Insulin “typically would not be in pre-filled syringes,” said Kirkman, adding that “there are some situations where a home health nurse, for example, might pre-fill syringes for someone who’s homebound. I think it’s just impossible to speculate.”

//

“It does seem odd,” said Lowery. “However, having been a school nurse, it involves more than giving out Band-Aids,” she said, noting that kids and teachers are coming in for a variety of ailments. “I can see, unfortunately, where it would be very easy to get flustered and confused.”

A woman answering the phone for the Wellesley superintendent’s office indicated that the investigation is ongoing and no answer could be provided for that particular question yet.

H1N1 swine flu hoax falls apart at the seams

January 21, 2010

Mike Adams
Natural News
Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

The great swine flu hoax of 2009 is now falling apart at the seams as one country after another unloads hundreds of millions of doses of unused swine flu vaccines. No informed person wants the injection anymore, and the entire fear-based campaign to promote the vaccines has now been exposed as outright quackery and propaganda.

Even doctors are now calling the pandemic a complete hoax. As reported on FoxNews, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a leading health authority in Europe, says that drug companies “organized a ‘campaign of panic’ to put pressure on the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a pandemic. He believes it is ‘one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century,’ and he has called for an inquiry.” (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933…)

H1N1 swine flu was never dangerous, and it never should have been escalated to a level-six pandemic in the first place. It was all a big marketing scam whose purpose was to simply sell vaccines. (And the CDC and WHO were in on it…)

And it worked! Big Pharma made out with billions of dollars in profits for a useless vaccine that’s now being dumped by the truck load. These vaccines were, of course, paid for with taxpayer dollars, making the Great Swine Flu Hoax of 2009 nothing more than an elaborate financial scam whose goal was to transfer wealth from the People to the shareholders of Big Pharma.

In just the fourth quarter of 2009, GlaxoSmithKline shipped $1.4 billion worth of vaccines. (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS…)

That’s $1.4 billion worth of taxpayer dollars, by the way. Dollars that could have been spent on nutrition or real health education. $1.4 billion worth of free vitamin D supplements would have done far more to protect public health than vaccines could ever hope to accomplish.

A bailout for Big Pharma

Wall Street hucksters have nothing on Big Pharma, the CDC and the WHO, all of which conspired to mislead the public and generate irrational fear in order to make money selling people vaccine shots they never needed in the first place.

The drug companies raked in billions of dollars in revenues while providing a product that offered absolutely no net reduction in mortality. In fact, as the long-term side effects of the vaccines remain unknown, it could turn out that the vaccines actually result in a net increase in mortality.

Meanwhile, countless people were harmed by the swine flu vaccine frenzy (it’s “countless” because nobody’s counting). In addition to those who were nearly paralyzed after receiving the vaccine shots, grade school students in Massachusetts who lined up to receive swine flu vaccine shots were instead injected with insulin. (Insulin injections can put you into a coma.) (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy…)

The school sent a letter home to students blaming the mishap on the school nurse. But if they weren’t injecting these kids with a useless vaccine for a non-pandemic, none of this would have happened in the first place.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
  • efoods

Total swine flu deaths for 2009 were far lower than the number of deaths from regular seasonal flu. And yet it turns out that thousands of Americans who died from the swine flu had been previously injected with the vaccines (http://www.naturalnews.com/027956_H…). In fact, according to calculations derived from official CDC estimates, thousands of vaccinated Americans died from swine flu anyway. The vaccines, it seems, don’t really work after all. You’re just as safe doing nothing.

Actually, getting the vaccine may harm your health. Outspoken Dr. Wodarg even says that the full extent of the damage from the insufficiently-tested vaccines may not be known for years. “The vaccine developed by Novartis was produced in a bioreactor from cancerous cells, a technique that had never been used until now,” he says.

Just what we need, huh? Cancer cells being injected into the population as part of a vaccine campaign.

Cancelling vaccine orders

The Swine Flu hoax has fizzled out, and countries like Greece, France and the UK have cancelled orders for vaccines that they now realize won’t be needed (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS…) (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8…). But even the fizzling of this hoax doesn’t mean it was a failure from the point of view of Big Pharma.

The swine flu hoax was a huge success not only for drug company profits, but also for certain influential individuals including Dr Julie Gerberding, former head of the CDC who has now accepted a high-paying job
as the president of Merck’s global vaccine operations. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027789_D…)

One minute you’re running the CDC, warning the country about a pandemic while urging everybody to get vaccinated, and the next minute you’re running the for-profit vaccine division of the world’s largest drug company. Amazing how that works, huh?

We called it right

I called much of this months ago in my popular hip-hop song, “Don’t Inject Me” which you can listen to here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/Dont_Inj…

Or watch on YouTube here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiXm…

As I stated in the song lyrics, which were written in early August, 2009:

The truth is outrageous
Don’t you know the drug companies made this flu
Don’t you know the swine flu is made by man
Pharmaceutical scam
It’s all part of the Big Brother population plan
They don’t want you to see the remedies
you can stop influenza with vitamin D for free
Herbal medicine is all that you need
But they can’t charge a fifty dollar fee
Unless
They inject you
The big drug companies are makin’ a killing
Collectin’ the billions and gettin’ away like a James Bond villain
Cuz’ they’re willin’ to do almost anything
Just to make money with the flu vaccine

Many clueless critics thought this song was some sort of outrageous conspiracy rant at the time. Turns out it was a spot-on prediction of the truth behind The Great Swine Flu hoax of 2009.

Sources for this story include:
Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933…

Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy…

Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS…
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS…

Greece cancels order for swine flu vaccine

January 20, 2010

RIA Novosti
January 19, 2010

Greece has canceled the remaining order for about 8 million batches of the vaccine against the deadly swine flu, local media said citing the
government sources.

Greece has previously ordered over 11 mln batches to vaccinate its entire population, and has received 3.6 mln batches, worth 25 mln euro ($36 mln) from that order.

“The state will pay only for vaccines which have been received so far,” local TV quoted Health Minister Mariliza Xenogiannakopoulou as saying on Monday.

The minister said the vaccination against the A/H1N1 virus had not been popular among the Greek citizens. Only about 360,000 Greeks have voluntarily received the vaccination up till now, and it is questionable if all the received vaccines would be used until their expiration in 2011.

According to official data, up to 96 people have died so far in Greece from the swine flu and its complications.

The World Health Organization (WHO) reported late in December 2009 that the death toll from the swine flu outbreak had reached 11,516 worldwide.

The number of infections continues to rise in some areas of central and eastern Europe, as well as in western, southern and central Asia, which were hit by the virus outbreak later than other parts of the world, the organization said.

WHO had earlier suspended publishing weekly reports on the spread of swine flu after some countries refused to report each infection.

ATHENS, January 19 (RIA Novosti)